« Initiatives Lose (and What Else Is New?) | Main | Twilight for Bush and Blair »

The Continuing Relevance of Both Redistricing and Campaign Finance Reform

I promised to comment on Josh"s statement on TPM that he was disappointed in the defeat of nonpartisan redistricting initiatives in California and Ohio because he has come to consider redistricting a reform even more important than campaign finance reform. I"ve moved somewhat in the opposite direction, and I"ll explain why.

When I first got involved in issues of political reform, around 1995, political reform was synonymous with reducing the influence of money on elections. That was the main thing, everything else -- redistricting, election-day voter registration, vote-by-mail -- was an afterthought, which I thought was short-sighted. There were a couple of different ways of getting at money in politics, mainly a choice between limiting contributions, and an emerging movement toward full public financing of elections. After the contested election of 2000, the range of electoral reforms widened out dramatically, including such basic issues as providing reliable voting machines. Then, earlier this year, nonpartisan redistricting emerged as a central focus, almost as campaign finance reform had been a few years earlier.

I get very frustrated with a fight over which reform is "more important" to a working democracy, finance reform, redistricting, or issues such as universal voter registration or voter i.d. requirements. They're important and interrelated, and that's not just a bullshit "everything's connected" kind of statement. Just take the two issues of districting and money. The small number of demographically contested races dramatically increases the arms-race mentality on the few targetted races, and in turn, the financial advantage of incumbents dramatically narrows the field of contested races. It's a loop, and if you could decisively break either factor, you would start to change the system.

So the question is which is easier to break? Districting is going to be a more difficult problem to fix. I say that not just because Tuesday's election results show that nonpartisan redistricting is a tough sell, but because the payoff is relatively small. Nonpartisan redistricting in Arizona and Iowa has had relatively little effect on competition, certainly not for the U.S. House of Representatives and not in the legislatures either. The Ohio initiative would have been a fascinating experiment, taking the state from a system of highly partisan (Republican) gerrymandering to a system that was not only non partisan but that, unlike any other system, put an absolute premium on competitiveness. (Under the failed proposal, anyone could propose a map, and the maps would be scored by computer for the number of competitive districts they would create, competitve defined as a 47-53 range. The nonpartisan commission would have had to choose from the three top-scoring maps.) Even this experiment was likely to produce only a handful of more competitive districts, and its defeat means that such a radical approach is unlikely to be tried anywhere else.

(Nor is it clear to me that this heavy priority on competitiveness would have led to the best representative democracy. I assume that the easiest way to ensure a competitive district would be to attach a heavily Democratic area to a heavily Republican one, so, for example, a district might graft together some African-American neighborhood of Cleveland with Shaker Heights or whatever the Republican exurb is that best illustrates my point. (I know almost nothing about Cleveland!) There might be a spirited competition between candidates from each half of the district, won by the one with the strongest turnout in his half, not necessarily by the one who reaches across the divide. And if a candidate does reach across the divide, the district won't seem as competitive anymore!)

Josh raises and rebuts a kind of straw man argument against redistricting -- the claim that people increasingly move to be with people who are more ideologically like themselves, and therefore that districts are becoming more strongly partisan by nature. There's a little evidence that that's occurring as a side-effect of other economic trends. But that's irrelevant. The fact is that most single-member, winner-take-all districts are going to have some partisan preference or another, at all times, and are not likely to be that competitive. The difference in competitiveness between neutrally drawn districts, a bipartisan gerrymander drawn to protect incumbents (the most common form), and a partisan gerrymander such as Texas or Ohio, is trivial. In fact, the partisan gerrymander might actually create a few more competitive districts, as in Texas last year. The only times when districts reliably seem to be competitive is when they are in transition from one allegiance to another. So, for example, in the late 1980s, districts in the Carolinas and Georgia were competitive as they slowly began to shed their historical attachment to Democrats; today the most competitive districts are likely to be wealthy Northeastern districts whose moderate Republican representatives have worn out their welcome. (A smaller number of districts, as I pointed out earlier this week.)

One good theoretical answer to the limited value of redistricting along is to go even further, and get rid of winner-take-all elections and single-member districts. Imagine, for example, a congressional district around the Cleveland metro area incorporating the city and its suburbs, electing four representatives by some form of preference voting. Most of the seats, and certainly the fourth, would be potentially competitive, and there would be significant incentives for candidates to reach beyond their natural bases to be at least the second and third choices of voters in other areas of the district or with other viewpoints.  (For more on this and related reforms, the best resource is always Fair Vote, formerly the Center for Voting and Democracy. They even have a separate page showing how these multi-member districts might work in any state. (I made up my example before looking at this page.))

Most of these alternatives are constitutionally allowable, but they are just not on the radar screen of people working on redistricting reform. And they are even more radically disruptive to the existing order than the Ohio initiative. (That's the whole point.) So one faces a choice: Do you say that redistricting might be a good idea, if you're willing to go well beyond what anyone's thinking about now and include multi-member districts and preference voting? Or do you try to move those ideas into the mainstream while also pushing hard on campaign finance reform?

I tend toward the second position. Keeping the sphere of democracy separate from the inequalities of the economic sphere is always a fundamental reform, and one that needs constant policing. And money -- or, more accurately, the absence of it -- is at least as formidable a barrier as districting. Emory political scientist Alan Abramowitz and colleagues put out a paper last year trying to measure the relative importance of money, gerrymandering and naturally increased partisanship in reducing competition and concluded that money was the most important factor. I raised some questions about their methodology as it applies to redistricting here, but on the whole, it's a good paper. The kind of campaign finance reform I'm interested in is not just the McCain-Feingold type that sets limits on large corrupting contributions, but initiatives whose principle objective is to make it easier for people who don't have access to those big dollars to run for office. That can be full public financing systems like those in Arizona or Maine, or systems that match small contributions, such as New York City's system that adds a four to one match to every contribution of $250 or less. And we need to find ways for reform to enhance the role that the Internet can play in helping candidates find sympathetic small donors, rather than treating the internet purely as a loophole to be closed. (There's more to say about that as well.)

To sum up, I think that both campaign finance reform and redistricting reform have to be part of opening up American politics. But on both, we need some fresh thinking and new strategies. On neither are we on the verge of big change. But I do think that because of the successful models such as Arizona and New York City, we are closer to a breakthrough on campaign finance reform than on redistricting, and I think that what's achievable now would make a bigger difference.

Posted by Mark Schmitt on November 10, 2005 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ce8a553ef00d8345d87b269e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Continuing Relevance of Both Redistricing and Campaign Finance Reform:

» Hornets' West Sidelined With Injured Ankle from Reid writes that
the TIMES-PICAYUNE, John Reid writes that Hornets forward David West missed [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 7, 2006 3:34:00 AM

» Cell Phones from mobilebum.info
News and ... Sep News of Safety phones, new cell phone phones Cell time ... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 8, 2006 5:31:58 PM

» Furniture search by phrase: Night Stands from Searching the Catalog
Modern furniture design store : Contemporary lighting, cool accessories and ... with the exact phrase. with at least one of the words. without the words ... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 12, 2006 7:18:52 PM

» Most popular words 2006: from Reader's Favorites at Scientific American
The articles includes Editor's Favorites, top e-mailed stories, and most popular articles. ... Babies Can Learn Words as Early as 10 Months ... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 13, 2006 8:38:34 AM

» Legalising and declassifying drugs from What if all drugs were legal?
urban75 drug information: a huge online resource of drug information, help and advice including cannabis, cocaine, heroin, ecstasy, solvents, ketamine and ... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 27, 2006 2:39:44 PM

» Father charged in federal terror probe released from custody - San Jose Mercury News from Reuters AlertNet
Hayat, a 48-year-old ice cream vendor, had been ... Father Charged in US Terror Probe Freed Washington [Read More]

Tracked on May 7, 2006 5:00:01 AM

» Job Search from Directory with Free People Search
Perform a quick job search using Job Bank USA's powerful job search engine. ... Thank you for using Job Bank USA's employment search services and job search ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 8, 2006 10:59:19 AM

» Opera 8 Reaches 1,000,000 Downloads, CEO Prepares to Swim from trip ticket to
with only one layover in Iceland for a cup of his mom's hot chocolate. Well, they did it. One million, fifty-thousand downloads later, he jumped into [Read More]

Tracked on May 15, 2006 6:37:54 AM

» Search in Directory: kayla kleevage from Directory Map
Directory of hundreds of search engines, organised by country and topic. [Read More]

Tracked on May 25, 2006 7:32:14 AM

» bad credit loan from loan mortgage
Loans Home Equity Loans - Home Mortgage Student Loans [Read More]

Tracked on May 27, 2006 5:31:00 PM

» home loan from college loan
Loans Home Equity Loans - Home Mortgage Student Loans [Read More]

Tracked on May 30, 2006 1:56:24 AM

» News Online from JapanHorse
Features weekly articles, archives to past issues, and timelines of scientific importance. [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 2, 2006 9:18:11 PM

» consolidation loan program student from loan mortgage
Loans Home Equity Loans - Home Mortgage Student Loans [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 4, 2006 8:56:08 PM

» qcarbo 1 shot groovy grape flavor from Detox process
The good news is that the detox process may enhance your body's ability to metabolize the medication and you may soon require less. But in the meantime, ... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 8, 2006 4:23:03 PM

» college loan from equity home loan rate
Loans Home Equity Loans - Home Mortgage Student Loans [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 12, 2006 10:29:51 PM

» Summertime No Time to 'Shirk' Learning from stay mentally
and ADD/ADHD, stay mentally active during summer. (PRWEB Jun 8, 2006) [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 13, 2006 10:19:11 AM

» Use of Antipsychotics by the Young Rose Fivefold from a continuing
is likely to inflame a continuing debate about the risks of using psychiatric medication in children. [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 18, 2006 1:15:50 AM

» Stargazing may Throw Fans Into Finals Frenzy from the rest of the
hit of a playoff season should end, with mega-stars meeting head to head in a matchup that oozes with story lines. [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 19, 2006 12:07:10 AM

» Web Catalog Online from Fast Search
Best Catalog [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 1, 2006 12:58:20 PM

» Search Center from
Web Catalog Online [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 2, 2006 10:41:55 AM

» States and Capitals from All USA States
State information resource links to state homepage, symbols, flags, maps, constitutions, ... All Rights Reserved. Press Ctrl - D to bookmark this page. ... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 17, 2006 9:28:35 AM

» USA towns: Oak Hall from USA MAP
USA - cities, towns and villages of the United States. Extensive business listings, community info, coupons and classified ads for USA cities, ... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 21, 2006 6:14:46 PM

» Canada wins world lacrosse title from is back on top
is back on top of the world in its national sport after a 28-year drought. [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 24, 2006 10:38:46 AM

» People Search in Internet 2006 from Plot Summary for Words
Words - Cast, Crew, Reviews, Plot Summary, Comments, Discussion, Taglines, Trailers, Posters, Photos, Showtimes, Link to Official Site, Fan Sites. [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 31, 2006 5:44:14 PM

» Bvlgari from Bvlgari Watches
Great Saving On Bvlgari Watches Bulgari Watch Bvlgari Assioma, Bulgari Zero1, Bulgari Watch Tubagas, Bvlgari Diagono Aluminium, ... [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 4, 2006 8:45:00 AM

» burberry from Burberry Perfume
Buy Burberry perfumes and aftershaves from the best UK shops online. Click on one of the products listed below to compare prices to find the best price to ... [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 4, 2006 9:04:11 AM

» clinique from clinique: Read reviews and compare prices
Shop our selection of Clinique fragrances and cosmetics online. ... Search results for "clinique". Item 1 to 10 out of 580 Show all, sorted by Popularity ... [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 4, 2006 4:37:50 PM

» India - MOEMIN Condemns strike on RSS HQ, Rejects violent ways to fight communal forces from the RSS headquarters
attempt to storm the RSS headquarters at Nagpur is deplorable, uncalled and needs strongest condemnation.... [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 7, 2006 8:30:36 PM

» Bvlgari from Bvlgari Watches
Great Saving On Bvlgari Watches Bulgari Watch Bvlgari Assioma, Bulgari Zero1, Bulgari Watch Tubagas, Bvlgari Diagono Aluminium, ... [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 9, 2006 9:12:49 AM

» Энциклопедия рунета from Internet Search
Выберите интересующий Вас раздел: 0-9 B C D E F G H I L M O R S T V W А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я TOP 20... [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 14, 2006 12:21:31 PM

» Ru-Энциклопедия from Words 2005-2006
Most Popular Words from Internet... [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 16, 2006 2:43:18 PM

Comments

Right on. Laws that support everyone running (and make voting easier and more transparent) **will** make the money thing less important, but even with money will make the democracy thing more important. Good line.

Posted by: ralph | Nov 10, 2005 10:21:16 PM

Thanks as always for the fine work.

One of the big reasons I was for Edwards during the last pres. primaries was his making strong statements (for a while at every appearance) about taking money 'completely out' of politics - realistically, some mix of public financing and free tv time. He said he would 'stand on the WH lawn' and regularly give the American people a report on what money in politics cost them THAT month, or whatever - until it changed. A stunt? A great stunt, if you ask me. It would be both popular (probalby VERY popular) and do good. If, in future, Edwards or someone else makes our political money sewer an important campaign issue, I'll follow them anywhere. Huge.

BTW, if it turned out to be Edwards (or any candidate with a forthright stand on this) vs McCain next time, McCain might have his name on a bill, but the dem would trump programatically. Really, any dem worth nominating would at least sound serious about cleaning politics up. But if one actually meant it (like Edwards certainly did), SO much could get done.

I really like the run-off election idea - that is the future, IMO. But as you so astutely pointed out, you can get at one side of the feedback loop or the other, and with some political leadership (AHEM) a LOT could get done on the money side, especially, obviously, after all these absolutely rotten-corrupt years.

Posted by: jonnybutter | Nov 10, 2005 11:55:57 PM

A mortgage - whether it's a home purchase, a refinancing, or a home equity
loan - is a product, just like a car, so the price and terms may be negotiable. You'll
want to compare all the costs involved in obtaining a mortgage. Shopping,
comparing, and negotiating may save you thousands of dollars. For details go to http://www.noqualifying.com/las-vegas-blog/

Posted by: Wally Smith | Dec 21, 2006 6:21:46 PM